Long-Term Care Insurance v. Medicaid Asset Protection Trust
Long-term care insurance (LTCI) and the Medicaid Asset Protection Trust (MAPT) are often thought of an alternatives to each other. They are not. While LTCI is both a shield and a sword, the MAPT is a shield only.
LTCI protects your assets and income from the costs of care. But it has a positive effect (the sword) in that it actually pays for someone to come into your home and care for you there. The MAPT protects assets, like your home and your life savings, but it does not protect your income (pensions, social security, interest, dividends, etc.). The MAPT has no positive effect in terms of providing care. It is solely a defensive tactic. That being said, in the event LTCI is unavailable to the client for medical or financial reasons, the MAPT is a wonderful tool. And there is
truth in the saying that a good defense is the best offense. With the MAPT in place five years ahead of time, the client's assets are protected and Medicaid will pay for the cost of care, over and above what your income provides. If you have a spouse at home, they may keep about $3,000 per month of the couple's combined income and sometimes more.
Our stated preference for clients is LTCI, if available. Most clients would prefer to “age in place” or, in other words, stay in their own home and receive home care if needed. Here, the LTCI stretches your dollars, to allow you to remain in the home for years more than you might have been able to afford otherwise. If your spouse is unable to care for themselves, it allows you to call in extra help so that you do not wear yourself out acting as a caregiver in your later years.
Some clients have adopted a hybrid approach when it comes to LTCI and the MAPT. They purposely underfund the LTCI, say taking a $200/day benefit ($6,000/month) instead of a $400/day benefit ($12,000/month). They also establish the MAPT and transfer their assets to the trust. The thinking is that the $200/day will pay for the home care that they may need and want, at half the cost of the full policy. On the other hand, if they end up in a nursing home, they won't lose their assets due to the $6,000/month they may be short, and Medicaid will pick up the difference.
There are no right and wrong answers in deciding which is the best avenue to take when considering protecting your assets from the high costs of long-term care. We have found, however, that an open discussion between the client and the experienced elder law attorney, with all of the facts and circumstances on the table, often yields the most satisfactory result.
This is the best choice for elder care and estate planning! Well established and transparent in services and quality of staff is suberb.
Jessica Kiely was knowledgeable and kind and gentle. Perfect blend of personality and knowledge for elder law.
Outstanding professionals at every level within their organization. Interpersonal communications outstanding.
Very happy with the firm and so pleased we have them helping us.
Mr Ettinger has worked with my family for over a decade and has provided excellent advice on numerous issues relating to trust and elder law.