Elder law estate planning

ABLE ACCOUNT LAW CHANGES BROADENING PROTECTIONS FOR SPECIAL NEEDS PLANNING

Published on: January 12, 2016 | by Ettinger Law Firm

On December 19, 2014 President Obama signed into law a number of tax and financial measures to extend certain tax benefits. More specifically, the legislation enacted the Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) Act of 2013, which amends section 529(e) of the United States Tax Code, to allow for tax-free savings accounts for individuals with disabilities. Almost a year later, almost to the day, both the Federal government and New York state both acted to expand the coverage under the ABLE Act. Prior to the most recent change, ABLE accounts had to be located in the same jurisdiction as the beneficiary.

The law also required state laws enabling such savings accounts. If the state did not have such enabling legislation, individuals in that state would not be able to set up such an account. On December 18, 2015, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed the New York Achieving a Better Life Experience (NY ABLE) Act allowing for such savings accounts in New York. On the same day that Governor Cuomo signed the NY ABLE Act, President Obama signed another spending bill that contained, among other things, legislative changes to the ABLE Act. More specifically, sections 302 and 303 of the bill allows for changes in what purchases or expenditures are permitted under the ABLE Act and allowed for beneficiaries to have such accounts in jurisdictions different than the one that they live in.

While one might reasonably believe that the NY ABLE Act is now not necessary, it still has much value as it allows for such accounts to exist within the state and thus subject to the various protections afforded under New York law. It would also draw in capital from other jurisdictions that do not have ABLE Act enabling legislation. All of these measures are part of an expansion of the laws that allow for the financial protections for financial and estate planning for those with special needs. Previous to the PATH Act, individuals with special needs who had savings accounts or other assets over a certain amount (generally, $2,000) would possibly be disqualified from certain governmental benefits. Savings in a PATH Act account will not jeopardize these benefits or eligibility for benefits.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ABLE ACT ACCOUNTS AND SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS

Published on: January 8, 2016 | by Ettinger Law Firm

WHAT IS BEST FIT

Both an ABLE Act account and a special needs trusts try to accomplish essentially the same thing. Both attempt to ensure that a special needs child or person are financially planned for through various legal and financial means so as to enrich the life of the beneficiary. An ABLE Act account as well as a special needs trust also aim to protect the beneficiaries valuable governmental benefits that utilize a means based testing for eligibility purposes. While both products roughly accomplish the same thing, one may be better at accomplishing one thing rather than the other.

TWO DIFFERENT MEANS TO ONE END

CHARITABLE ROLLOVER OF RETIREMENT ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION NON-TAXABLE DISTRIBUTION FROM IRA

Published on: January 5, 2016 | by Ettinger Law Firm

On December 18, 2015 President Obama signed the Protecting Americans from Tax Hike (PATH) Act, which made permanent, among other things, three rather popular charitable tax incentives were set to expire January 1, 2016. The most important provision of the PATH Act for estate planning purposes is the continued allowance of rollover of individual retirement account distribution. This particular measure came into law in 2006 as part of the Pension Protection Act as a temporary measure. It expired and brought back to life several times over in the last nine years. The measure has shown itself to be a wildly popular measure, with approximately $140 million in charitable donations in the first two years and hundreds of millions going to colleges and universities in the last nine years. It seems likely that with the permanence of the new law, charitable givings will likely increase.

REQUIREMENTS OF CHARITABLE ROLLOVER

There are some important rules that are necessary to satisfy in order to qualify for the tax deduction benefits. They are:

HOW LONG CAN IRS COME AFTER ME? THE SUMNER REDSTONE CASE

Published on: January 2, 2016 | by Ettinger Law Firm

Sumner Redstone is an entertainment business mogul with a majority share ownership of CBS entertainment and Viacom, and through Viacom, BET and Paramount Pictures, all through his majority ownership of his family business, National Amusement, which originally started out in the drive in movie theater business during The Great Depression. In just the last few weeks a case against Mr. Redstone by the IRS presents an oddity in the law, which may make many people shutter. More particularly, the IRS issued a Notice of Deficiency for a taxable event from 1972 – over 40 years later.

The nature of the case revolved around a transfer of shares in National Amusement Corporation in 1972 to separate trusts set up for the grandchildren of the founder, Sumner Redstone’s father Michael Redstone. Sumner set up one trust for his kids while his siblings set up separate trusts for their kids. At the time the transfer of interfamily stock was of a insignificant amount that passing them from personal ownership to a trust did not even require a tax return. One can and should ask about the concept of a statute of limitation.

Apparently, as the case against Mr. Redstone shows, the IRS does not have a statute of limitation for unfiled tax returns. 26 U.S.C. § 6501(c)(1) establishes that when a taxpayer files a fraudulent tax return, (c)(2) otherwise attempts to avoid tax liability, or (c)(3) fails to file a tax return, there is no statute of limitation. Mr. Redstone has an impressive educational pedigree, where he graduated from first in his class from the Boston Latin School and then graduated Harvard in only three years in 1944, which was actually common at the time. After graduation he served as an officer in the United States Army, helping to decode Japanese messages. He attended Georgetown Law School after the war and then received his LL.B. in 1947 from Harvard Law. After working for various governmental departments followed by private practice, Mr. Redstone went to work for the family business, which was booming by then.

DONATE MY BODY TO SCIENCE

Published on: October 29, 2015 | by Ettinger Law Firm

Donating an organ or even a whole body for scientific study or medical education is a relatively common event, which permits a person with perhaps a rare or not well understood disease to contribute to medical science. Even if the person passes without a disease or any unique characteristics, medical schools need these volunteers for very important work. Some people see their act as an act of charity, a way of giving a gift to society. Organ donation helps to reach even more people by providing spare parts for surgeons, for those who need a replacement organ or tissue. It has been estimated that 114,000 Americans are awaiting organ transplants and that one person is added to the list every 11 minutes and that each year 6,600 people die each year while on the organ transplant list.

ANATOMICAL GIFTS PERMITTED VIA WILL

In 2005, the New York legislature passed a law which made it easier to give an anatomical gift. Organ donation is easy enough now, as it can be a mere check the box designation on your driver’s license. No additional signatures or witnesses are needed. New York further permits a person to validly donate their organs or their whole body by way of will. If the will is later invalidated, the donation is considered valid and any physician or medical school acting on the gift is shielded from liability. Some people with religious or moral objections to donating their body may still decide to donate organs without violating their conscience or religion. Even with these provisions in place, it is still best to discuss these decisions with your family and loved ones.

Who will Manage Your Affairs in the Event You are Incapacitated?

Published on: October 1, 2015 | by Ettinger Law Firm

No one likes to consider the fact that they may one day need help in managing their affairs, but the fact remains many people will need a fiduciary they can trust to act on their behalf when incapacitated. Typically as part of an estate plan, an individual will execute a power of attorney appointing one or more individuals of their choice to manage their health care decisions and financial matters in the event they can no longer handle their own affairs. Powers of attorney can vary in scope and purposes, and can serve as one method to avoid judicial intervention, including guardianship or conservatorship proceedings.

Guardianship Proceedings

When a health care or financial power of attorney are not sufficient or absent from an estate plan, a guardianship or conservatorship proceeding may be necessary to appoint someone to represent the person suffering an incapacity. In New York, a proceeding for guardianship can be commenced by a variety of parties, including, a distributee of the incapacitated person’s estate, certain fiduciaries, an interested party concerned with the welfare of the individual, or the incapacitated person himself. Incapacity is determined by clear and convincing evidence that the individual is unable to manage their own affairs and is unable to understand the consequences surrounding their inability in such a way that will likely cause harm to themself or others.Courts will consider a variety of factors when selecting a guardian, including the incapacitated person’s specific needs and the capabilities of the proposed guardian in meeting those needs.

The Mickey Rooney Example: Be Clear About Funeral & Burial Plans

Published on: April 16, 2014 | by Ettinger Law Firm

Legendary actor Mickey Rooney died earlier this month at the age of 93. Over the later course of his life, Rooney offered many important lessons related to elder law estate planning. For one thing, he was a vocal advocate against senior financial exploitation. In 2011 he testified before a U.S. Senate committee that was analyzing the various aspects of elder abuse. Rooney told the committee that he was emotionally and financially abused at the hand of his step-children (the biological children of his estranged wife).

At that hearing, Rooney echoed the thoughts of many New York seniors who were in the same situation, explaining, “For years I suffered silently. I didn’t want to tell anybody […] Even when I tried to speak up, I was told to shut up and be quiet.”

Fighting Continued After Death

Is New York Ready For Boom in Old Age?

Published on: May 8, 2013 | by Ettinger Law Firm

The Post-Star recently published a story with the provocative headline: “Old Age is Coming, and We Are Not Ready.”

The article touches on some practical issues in New York state that have often been discussed in the wake of the national demographic shift that is already underway. As most know, the population is aging. But far fewer give serious consideration to what these means for those seniors (and society as a whole). The coming of old age has two main questions: (1) Do we have the appropriate quantity of services to provide the care necessary for all seniors in need in future years? (2) If not, how are we going to come up with the resources to acquire those services?

Minimal Senior Care Services

Authorities Often Act Too Late to Prevent Elder Financial Abuse

Published on: November 17, 2011 | by Ettinger Law Firm

The Bellingham Herald discussed an often overlooked but vital matter that is of serious concern to our New York elder law estate planning attorneys: elder financial exploitation. Our work helping local residents avoid the probate process, save taxes, and plan for disability, involves elements of trust and relationship-building. Yet, we understand that there are some criminals who are bent on building up trust with seniors only to use their position of influence for their own gain. These fraudulent actors can be found in various settings, from nursing homes and assisted living facilities to one’s own network of friends and family. All local seniors must remain alert to these dangers.

Prevention is particularly important with elder financial abuse, because after the crime is perpetrated there is often little that authorities can do to correct the harm. The Herald story discussed one senior who lost nearly $775,000 in a scheme in which he thought he was investing money only to learn that it was being stolen. The company in which he invested filed for bankruptcy and as was later described as a mere Ponzi scheme. The man leading the fraudulent enterprise was arrested, but the money taken from the senior victim was gone.

Some advocates are raising concerns about the tools available to authorities to help these victims, making it difficult to protect them before they suffer actual financial harm. For example, at the time the victim described in this story began dealing with the fraudulent investor, that investor was already the target of multiple ethics probes for misappropriation of client funds and had actually been charged with a crime. Yet nothing was done to stop the criminal from swindling others. One advocate explained that this case is far from unique. He noted, “It is a common complaint in fraud cases involving the elderly: prosecutors, social service agencies, and attorney regulators are often slow to act, and by the time they do, the damage is done.” Prosecutorial inexperience handling these cases is part of the problem. In addition, some claim that local police officials are not properly trained to handle these matters.