Drastic revisions to the New York Medicaid system have been well documented in recent years. Most attention relates to a crackdown on fraud and similar cost-cutting measures. The spur for the alternations, as with so many government program decisions, is the hope of reigning in costs and ensuring the program’s viability for many years to come.
There is an assumption that saving on costs can only be accomplished by taking away available services. But that is not always the case. Take, for example, the long-term care aspect of Medicaid. The annual cost of care in a skilled nursing facility is incredibly high. New York homes have some of the steepest price tags in the country. On top of that, many residents would rather not live in the restrictive facilities in the first place. Obviously some of the most ill seniors simply must have around-the-clock care. But others who may be able to live off less intensive support are forced to move into a facility for lack of options. In other words, it is a situation where the state is paying significantly for a service that many would rather not have anyway.
Fortunately, in recent months the state has worked to flip the model, saving money and providing more tailored service in the process. A Wall Street Journal story last week touched on some of the general themes of the change.