Trusts and Estates Wills and Probate Tax Saving Strategies Medicaid

Schedule an in-office, Zoom or phone consultation Here.

The Post-Star recently published a story with the provocative headline: “Old Age is Coming, and We Are Not Ready.”

The article touches on some practical issues in New York state that have often been discussed in the wake of the national demographic shift that is already underway. As most know, the population is aging. But far fewer give serious consideration to what these means for those seniors (and society as a whole). The coming of old age has two main questions: (1) Do we have the appropriate quantity of services to provide the care necessary for all seniors in need in future years? (2) If not, how are we going to come up with the resources to acquire those services?

Minimal Senior Care Services

The results of a comprehensive new research effort on Medicaid’s effects on low-income residents was just published in the New England Journal of Medicine. The full summary of the article can be found online here.

As discussed in the New York Times late last week, the project compared individuals who received Medicaid support over a period of two years with those in similar income brackets who were not enrolled in Medicaid. The idea was to compare these groups on a wide range of indicators–financial well-being, physical health, mental health, and more. As such, it provides the most comprehensive understanding yet of how wide-ranging Medicaid changes may impact various community members.

Counterintuitive Results?

The reverberations of Hurricane Sandy’s impact on the city are far from finished. We will be cleaning up and adapting for many months–likely years–into the future. Considering the predictions of some, we may even have to deal with large storms of this magnitude on a far more consistent basis. It affects all areas of life–including things like senior care and nursing home operations.

Many New Yorkers were shocked to learn of the goings-on at some long-term care facilities hit hardest by Sandy. Stories have been told of seniors stuck in upper levels of flooded facilities for days without power. Many questions have been raised about the management of the long-term care facilities and confusion over why the senior residents were not evacuated. In fact, in large part because of the struggle with NYC nursing home evacuations during Sandy, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will release new disaster planning for all nursing homes in the coming year.

Looking to the future, local residents are advised to understand evacuation plans for long-term care facilities where loved ones reside–or to ask about such plans when making nursing home choices. An AARP story recently profiled nursing home evacuation plans, pointing out the critical issues that facility caregivers need to consider. It is worth browsing the list to get an idea of the questions that owners and operators in New York need to be asked to ensure that seniors are protected in case any manner of natural or man-made disaster strikes requiring quick action.

Forbes recently reported on a unique case that illustrates what happens when one fails to conduct any NY estate planning and does not have close heirs to take an inheritance via default intestacy rules.

The article explained how a man named Roman Blum died in January of this year. A former real estate developer, Mr. Blum was worth about $40 million at the time of his passing. He was 97. Remarkably, for one with such wealth, Blum did not have any estate planning conducted–no use of trusts or even a will to designate final wishes and property distribution.

When one dies without a will special rules apply which include a ranking list of possible inheritors. In New York, for example, an estate is usually split between a spouse and children (with a special $50,000 addition to the spouse). If there are no children, then everything goes to the spouse. If there is no surviving spouse, then everything goes to the children. If one has no spouse or children, then everything goes to parents, and absent living parents, siblings.

Last week we shared information about the revelations in the New York Times that efforts to curb New York Medicaid costs have been less than successful–mostly because of expanded enrollment in certain programs, like senior day care centers. These assistance centers are locations where frail and sometimes vulnerable elderly community members can stay during the day, while other caregivers–usually adult children–are at work. The facilities offer a way for seniors to avoid being forced to move into a long-term care home.

While useful, concerns have mounted regarding the tactics used by the operators of these facilities to increase enrollment. Owners of the adult care facilities are paid based on the number of eligible New York Medicaid recipients who attend. Therefore, it is in the best interest of the operators financially to increase enrollment–and that is exactly what they have been doing. The increase has been so stark, that some worry that the cost-savings intended (by averting expensive nursing home stays) may be illusory.

Temporary Suspension

Celebrity estate planning complications and feuds are often used to illustrate basic planning principles or common problems. Perhaps none of those examples are as well-known, especially for New Yorkers, as the sad case of the estate of Brooke Astor. The legendary socialite and philanthropist died several years ago. Since her passing, a wide-range of claims were made regarding the distribution of her assets and criminal activity on the part of those responsible for her care and affairs in the later years of her life.

Astor reportedly suffered from Alzheimer’s at the end of her life–an affliction that similarly affects many New York seniors. Unfortunately, also like many others, it seems that her condition was abused by the very people who were supposed to look-out for her.

Astor’s son, Brooke Marshall, was criminally charged with exploiting his mother to funnel more money to himself. Marshall was ultimately convicted, along with a co-defendant, of illegally giving himself a $2 million “raise” to administer the estate. Claims also suggested that an amendment to Astor’s will in 2004 included a forged signature.

A New York Times article this week took a look at the consequences of a Medicaid change engineered by Governor Cuomo in the hopes of saving money: switching to “managed-care” for NY Medicaid programs.

The basic idea is straightforward: switch from paying providers a “fee for service” and instead make a specific payment to provide proper care–whatever that care might be. The logic goes that when medical care providers receive a fee for specific actions performed, they are incentivized to provide more services, even if they aren’t needed. By switching to a set payment amount, those providers will be incentivized to simply provide the most efficient care possible. They will also be more competitive, trying to increase quality of care to attract more Medicaid participants.

The Reality

Residents are often warned to complete their estate planning–wills and trusts–before it is “too late.” Most assume that the planning is only “too late” if they die before getting it done. But that is a mistake. In many cases “too late” actually refers to losing the competency to create the legal documents. As a practical matter, it may even mean before one even has the appearance of mental health issues, because even a hint of problems may open the door to legal challenge from others.

Estate planning is about ensuring one’s wishes are carried out and maximizing the preservation of assets without controversy. Limiting that controversy includes completing the planning early and efficiently, minimizing the risk of problems down the road. Thought of in that way, “too late” is far earlier than simply “before you die.”

John duPont Estate

From suspicious claims in an email to unsolicited letters, most of us assume we are not naive enough to fall victim to a financial scammer. This is a mistake. It takes only a moment of confusion or a lapse in judgement to provide a fraudster with the the tools they need to steal.

Financial scammers thrive in confusion and unfamiliarity. There is a reason that seniors are targeting more often than others–the elderly may be less familiar with certain aspects of modern technology or culture. As such, scammers are able to poke at their uncertainty in order to gain trust and ultimately take advantage.

These frauds are often connected to current events. Disgustingly, it was only hours after the Boston bombings that some fake charities were set up in an attempt to dupe well-intentioned community members into donating money that would end up in the pockets of criminals. Along the same lines, fraudsters are trying to exploit unfamiliarity and confusion about the high-profile national health care law. Many aspects of the law are set to take effect this year, and most community members are unfamiliar with the details of those changes. Scam artists are stepping into the void, working to use the complexity of the law to solicit funds from unsuspecting community members. Senior citizens are the most likely to be hurt.

Do I have enough to retire? Countless New Yorkers ask their financial advisers, estate planning attorneys, and other professionals that very question each and every day. There is no one-size-fits-all response, as retirement is a personal matter based on individual expectations, goals, and perspective.

Mountains of pages have been written about how much money you should have before retiring and what you should do with it. Perspectives abound.

Interestingly, there is less disagreement about general characteristics that make one more or less likely to be financially secure enough to retire. For example, the Wall Street Journal pointed to a new study last week which found that married couples are far better positioned to make the leap and officially enter retirement.

Contact Information