Trusts and Estates Wills and Probate Tax Saving Strategies Medicaid

Schedule an in-office, Zoom or phone consultation Here.

The Bellingham Herald discussed an often overlooked but vital matter that is of serious concern to our New York elder law estate planning attorneys: elder financial exploitation. Our work helping local residents avoid the probate process, save taxes, and plan for disability, involves elements of trust and relationship-building. Yet, we understand that there are some criminals who are bent on building up trust with seniors only to use their position of influence for their own gain. These fraudulent actors can be found in various settings, from nursing homes and assisted living facilities to one’s own network of friends and family. All local seniors must remain alert to these dangers.

Prevention is particularly important with elder financial abuse, because after the crime is perpetrated there is often little that authorities can do to correct the harm. The Herald story discussed one senior who lost nearly $775,000 in a scheme in which he thought he was investing money only to learn that it was being stolen. The company in which he invested filed for bankruptcy and as was later described as a mere Ponzi scheme. The man leading the fraudulent enterprise was arrested, but the money taken from the senior victim was gone.

Some advocates are raising concerns about the tools available to authorities to help these victims, making it difficult to protect them before they suffer actual financial harm. For example, at the time the victim described in this story began dealing with the fraudulent investor, that investor was already the target of multiple ethics probes for misappropriation of client funds and had actually been charged with a crime. Yet nothing was done to stop the criminal from swindling others. One advocate explained that this case is far from unique. He noted, “It is a common complaint in fraud cases involving the elderly: prosecutors, social service agencies, and attorney regulators are often slow to act, and by the time they do, the damage is done.” Prosecutorial inexperience handling these cases is part of the problem. In addition, some claim that local police officials are not properly trained to handle these matters.

The AARP Public Policy Institute recently released a new report discussing the contributions that family members nationwide make to caring for their elderly family members. Recent news has focused on how local, state, and federal governments will handle the burdens of caring for an aging population. Yet, as this new report points out, the costs bore by family caregivers actually dwarfs that spent by these public bodies. It is a reminder that long-term care planning remains more than just a necessity for seniors but also for their entire family.

The size of the numbers is undeniable. Roughly 42 million family members are acting as caregivers for their senior loved ones at any point in time, with nearly 62 million providing at least some support throughout the year. In economic terms, these caregivers provide over $450 billion in annual, unpaid care. That total is up 20% from two years before ($375 billion). These totals include the contributions of millions of area residents who provide support for aging family members whose New York elder care planning went awry or whose plan was nonexistent. The financial estimates are actually conservative. They do not account for care given by those under the age of 18. They also do not include caregivers who provide assistance outside of basic daily living tasks, like help with bathing, dressing, managing medications, and aid with finances.

It is helpful to put these family-provided long-term elder care costs into context. The $450 billion annual sum is more than the total Medicaid spending, for both basic health and long-term support services. When looking only at Medicaid support for senior care, the costs bore by families is four times larger. Researchers believe that the $75 billion increase in the previous two years was primarily caused by an increase in the total number of caregivers and hours of care provided. In other words, the allotted value of the work ($11.16 per hour) remained constant over that period of time.

Yesterday the Kansas City Star published a story on the necessity of properly updating estate planning documents. The article shared the story of a local woman whose mother had just died. The mother had created a living trust several years before and placed her residence within the trust. However, a few years after the planning occurred, the mother sold her house and moved into a different home. She died shortly after the move. The adult daughter was left wondering whether or not probate would be required for her to obtain her mother’s home.

The daughter learned after talking to legal professionals in the area that the key issue was whether her mother had taken title to the new home in the name of her trust. If so, then the new home would likely be part of the mother’s living trust to be passed to the named beneficiary of the trust per its terms. However, if the new home was not titled in the trust’s name, then it likely would not pass on via the trust. Instead the public probate process would be required for the daughter to obtain the residence.

Of course the entire purpose of the mother creating a trust in this case was to avoid probate, save on taxes, and ensure that her family members would have as seamless a transfer process as possible in the inherently difficult time. By not taking her earlier planning into account when making future transactions or consulting her estate planning attorney to assure everything was in order, the mother risked having her plan fail to work as desired at the very moment it was needed.

Investment News published a story yesterday declaring that the current financial, political, and social climate made it a “perfect storm” for estate planning. It was explained how tax policy proposals, low interest rates, and a relatively weak economy make now a particularly worthwhile time for local families to take steps to plan for their long-term financial future. Our New York estate planning attorneys continue to help many local families do just that. As one observer explained in the article, “If individuals are trying to transition assets to the next generation, we currently have a perfect storm–in a good sense–to do it.”

Any time is a good idea to visit a professional and make future financial preparations. However, it may be particularly valuable to do so now, because planning strategies currently available might soon be gone. For one thing, large estate tax and gift tax exemptions now make it possible for individuals to transfer up to $5 million (or $10 million for couples) tax free. However, it is unlikely that the current tax scheme will remain–it is only a matter of what changes will be made and when. Observers have noted that estate rules have been changed 19 times in the last quarter century alone.

The current climate may present particularly attractive options encouraging some families to make major decisions to save on taxes and pass on assets. But many advocates explain that the tried and true planning tools that have long been available often remain the best way for many community members to accomplish their long-term estate planning goals. For example, while it may be favorable to give large gifts in the current environment, many families are uncomfortable making extremely large gifts. Instead, their goals may be best met by making smaller gifts under the $13,000 annual exemption amount. Those families can then save on estate taxes down the road by setting up trusts that distribute money more conservatively along the way.

On Wednesday Congressman Ted Deutch published an editorial in Politico advocating on behalf of a stalled federal initiative known as the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act (CLASS). The measure was hailed as the first federal attempt to address the nation’s long-term care crisis. All those in our area who have dealt with the complexities and expense of finding proper New York elder care are likely familiar with this crisis. CLASS was part of the high-profile Affordable Care Act that passed Congress, but CLASS was recently suspended by the President.

The Representative explained that CLASS was essentially a means by which middle class families could have a voluntary and affordable long-term care insurance option. An important part of the CLASS program that needed to be addressed was the idea of “adverse selection”–the notion that insurance would only be bought by those who already needed the care. Of course, the maximum benefit is derived only when individuals have this insurance plan in place ahead of time. The measure is currently stalled specifically because of concerns about adverse selection. Yet, many, including Representative Deutch, believe that federal officials have statutory power to implement anti-adverse-selection measures.

CLASS was pushed by those who understand the looming problem facing the long-term care system. Only five percent of Americans have long-term care insurance, even though seventy to seventy five percent of all Americans will need some form of long-term care. The gap is often replaced by federal programs, like Medicaid. The Congressman explained that the reliance on Medicaid is unsustainable at the federal level. This is in addition to the fact that qualifying for Medicaid often requires residents to spend themselves into poverty, especially when planning is absent. Fixing the problem before it gets worse was the motivation behind CLASS. The measure hopes to steer residents away from the most expensive institutionalized care to more balanced programs that encourage cost-effective and resident-focused community care. Besides the cost savings, these programs are almost always preferred by seniors, because they allow them to live at home, maximizing their freedom.

Last month Forbes discussed an estate feud that brewed followed the suicide death of a reality show star. Late this summer, the 47-year old star of “Real Housewives of Beverly Hills,” Russell Armstrong, took his own life. His wife, Taylor Armstrong, had filed for divorce shortly before the death. However, the divorce was not final at the time of Mr. Armstrong’s passing, meaning that per the rules of the state she was the next of kin. As such she maintained a certain level of control over his affairs–including his funeral and burial plans. Without instructions to the contrary in estate planning documents, even estranged spouses may maintain this control.

Making matters worse in this situation, it appears that Mrs. Armstrong never maintained a good relationship with her former husband’s family. As a result, she did not initially tell the family about the funeral, burial, or memorial plans. The man’s parents and siblings wanted his remains buried in his home state of Texas, but Mrs. Armstrong claimed that she wanted to bury him in Los Angeles. It remains unclear exactly how the ugly situation will be resolved.

Unfortunately, the burial dispute may be just the beginning. Depending on Mr. Armstrong’s estate planning documents, his estranged wife may still be entitled to inherit most of his assets. That is why it is important to seek out professional help in the middle of a divorce. Otherwise, there is no telling what might happen. As the article notes, “Fights over the estate of someone who passed away in the midst of a divorce are especially common.” Other recent high-profile examples include the deaths’ of Dennis Hopper and Gary Coleman.

The gift tax has implications in a variety of New York estate planning situations, from deciding the best way to provide aid to loved ones to conducting business succession planning. As with many other tax issues, timing is important because lawmakers at the federal and state level can change these rates. While the risk of rate changes always exists, there has been significant discussion as of late about a variety of potential changes involving the 12-member federal “Super Committee.” The Super Committee has been charged by Congress with reducing the federal deficit by $1.5 trillion over the next ten years. To do so, the group will have to enact a combination of spending reductions and tax changes. No matter what combination they ultimately decide upon, it is highly likely that their work will have effects on local residents crafting their New York estate plan.

For example, last week the Wall Street Journal’s Market Watch published a story explaining proposed changes to gift tax exclusions. The specific committee meetings are mostly private, so some of the recent thoughts on the committee’s actions are speculative. However, it is known that one of the President’s proposed recommendations to the committee includes reducing the estate, gift, and generation-skipping transfer tax thresholds. The proposal would reduce the tax-free gift threshold to its 2009 level of $1 million. Currently the tax-free threshold is supposed to stay at $5 million until the end of 2012. However, many are speculating that the committee may decide to return the exclusion back to $1 million a year early as a cost-saving measure.

The story’s author summarizes the changes by noting, “Overall tax planning and gift tax thresholds that are now available could be at risk for families…not much good can come from the committee’s recommendations from a wealth preservation perspective.” Clearly, the potential actions by this group may make it important for some local residents to take long-term financial actions now. Our New York estate planning attorneys urge all community members who may be affected by these changes to visit with a professional to either create a plan or update an existing one. Depending on the advice received, it may be prudent to accelerate planned lifetime gifts, review estate-tax funding mechanisms, or otherwise revise estate plans.

Last week Reuters discussed the growing number of adult Americans who are financially supporting their senior parents. As the author quips, many of these residents have becomes the “Bank of Sons and Daughters” after the recent financial crisis decimated the savings of many elderly family members. According to MetLife‘s new National Health and Retirement Study, the percentage of adult children spending time and money on their parent’s care has tripled in the last decade and a half. This comes as no surprise to our New York elder law attorneys who know that rising long-term care costs, the economic downturn, and failure to plan ahead for senior care places many families in tough situations when a loved one ages and needs extra day-to-day care.

The MetLife data found that roughly a quarter of all adults are currently providing at least some financial assistance to their parents. A similar survey from Caring.com suggests that adult children may be providing even more support, as thirty two percent of respondents said they’ve spent at least $5,000 on their parents’ living expenses within the last year. A large majority of that group admitted that supporting their parents leads them to worry about their own long-term financial situation. As one researcher involved in the data collection explained, “There are just a ton of families where the second or third generation needs to help the first generation. People are asking, a lot, about how to do it.”

Not only does financially supporting aging parents often place stress on the finances of the adult children, but, if not done properly, it may actually be harmful to the senior. As each New York elder law attorney at our firm has explained to local residents, it is important to properly tailor financial gifts such that they don’t inadvertently disqualify the parent from government benefits. Certain programs are in place to help seniors receive the care they need even if they do not have the resources to purchase it. However, qualification for those programs, such as New York Medicaid, is based on need. If adult children do not take those qualifications into account, they may unknowingly complicate their parent’s program participation.

It is no surprise that only 9% of Baby Boomers stated in a new Associated Press poll that they were “strongly convinced” that they would be able to live comfortably when they retired. With financial affairs in flux for many members of the 77-million strong Baby Boomer generation, many are beginning to reevaluate their retirement plans. Our New York elder law estate planning attorneys know that a growing number of local residents find themselves worrying about whether they will be able to live out their golden years in comfort.

One single 53-year old woman profiled in an Associated Press story on the Baby Boomer retirement situation explained that she once planned to retire at sixty and move to the beach. Those plans changed when her pension was eliminated five years ago, her personal investments tanked, and her home of 21 years lost half its value. Now she is not sure what her future holds, but she doesn’t expect to move any time soon. When asked about potentially moving when he retired, a 60-year old small business owner explained, “It just depends on what happens to the economy. I’d like to find someplace warmer and doesn’t have the high taxes, but we’ll just have to see.” Many local residents find themselves in the same situation.

The latest poll on the topic found that about 60% of Boomers had retirement plans, personal investments, and real estate that lost value in the latest recession. As a result, more than half of that group expects to delay their retirement. According to the research, 73% of respondents claimed that they will continue to do some work even after they retire. These delayed retirement plans have also led many Boomers to admit that they no longer expect to move out of their current home, and a majority claim that they plan to live out their golden years exactly where they are now. Other priorities for soon-to-be retirees include living near their children and being close to necessary medical care.

An article this week from West Fair Online explained how professionals working with residents on financial issues have seen a significant increase in demand for their services as of late. While there may be a tendency among some to become paralyzed when the economy is so volatile, many others view the instability as a time to act prudently and plan ahead as much as possible. The article reports what our New York estate planners have long known: the need to have an estate plan remains strong regardless of the circumstances.

Experts know that the need for prudent planning is perhaps even more important at times like these, when there tax and policy uncertainties at the local, state, and federal levels. One planner interviewed for the story explained how in turbulent financial times “the area’s residents should have a vested interest in knowing what the stakes are for their assets.” While those residents at the top income levels are often more aware of how the laws affect them, many middle class families have just as much to gain by using the legal tools available to plan their financial future and save taxes in the long-term.

Most observers have applauded the steady rise in estate planning awareness. However, there are still a few groups which continue to neglect their planning needs. For example, many local small business owners continue to miss out on opportunities to visit with a New York estate planning lawyer to take care of long-term financial goals. Of course, small business owners wear many hats. Rarely do they have time to accomplish everything on their “to do” list each day. Yet, many benefits have been reported by those who have carved out time to visit with financial professionals to protect assets, create a succession plan, and conduct similar tasks.

Contact Information