Trusts and Estates Wills and Probate Tax Saving Strategies Medicaid

Schedule an in-office, Zoom or phone consultation Here.

Proper Inheritance planning requires much more than simply filing in the blanks on standardized forms. That is why experienced New York estate planning attorneys are essential advisors when local community members are evaluating their long-term financial preparations. Proper planning of these affairs requires consideration of unique family dynamics and an ability to anticipate potential issues before they actually arise. Anticipating possible conflict and accounting for it ahead of time is one of the main benefits that local residents can derive from creating and updating their New York estate plan.

For example, local families often have concerns about the effect that a second marriage will have on their inheritance plans. Many emotions are at play when a parent remarries after a divorce or the death of a spouse. As a CNN story this weekend explained, adult children commonly express apprehension when a parent re-enters the dating pool or indicates a wish to get remarried. Financial concerns are occasionally the cause of that trepidation. One woman who lost her father several years ago explained, “I want my mom to be happy, but how do I know that her suitors don’t have ulterior motives? I’m concerned that she’ll jump into another marriage and her second husband will take advantage of her financially.”

Conversations between loved ones about these issues are frequently thorny and often result in strained family relationships. On one hand, as the article author notes, a parent is free to use their finances as they see fit. After all, an inheritance is not an entitlement but a gift. However, adult children need not stand by if a parent is genuinely making damaging financial decisions or is legitimately being taken advantage of–elder financial exploitation is a common problem. Therefore, in these situations an experienced, trained professional can often provide a crucial perspective to balance the competing concerns.

Local residents usually take the time to craft a New York estate plan because they wish to prepare for disability, save estate taxes, and avoid the probate process. In most cases these goals are best met through the use of a living trust. The trend over the past several decades is for middle class families to craft trusts instead of wills for their inheritance planning. As our New York elder law estate planning attorney Bonnie Kraham explained in an article published this week in the Times Herald-Record, unlike wills, trusts are private documents that do not need to be filed with the Surrogate’s Court. No costly, stressful, time-consuming probate process needs to be undertaken upon one’s death when a trust is used.

Instead of court involvement, a trust is usually administered by a successor trustee. Upon the death of the original trustee (the individual who created the trust), the successor trustee must inform the beneficiaries of the situation, gather and invest the grantor’s assets, notify creditors, pay taxes, and distribute assets per the trust provisions.

Attorney Kraham notes that the trustee who administers the trust has a variety of other obligations. They must remain loyal to all beneficiaries, including the contingent beneficiaries–acting impartially between them at all times. Also, the trustee must ensure that trust property produces income. Therefore it is incumbent upon the trustee not to keep large amounts in non-interest bearing accounts or allow a home to sit vacant. At the same time, all investments must be prudent, and a sound overall investment strategy must be employed. This typically requires diversification which balances both income production and investment safety. Other trustee duties include the filing of tax returns, distribution of trust income, handling of expenses, and the maintenance of proper records.

Last week state legislators proposed New York Medicaid changes which would eliminate the financial involvement of local county governments–a state take-over of the program. However, this change would do nothing to curb the overall costs of the program. Lawmakers explain that reigning in Medicaid costs remains a top priority, and so additional alterations to the program are likely. Many observers are calling for tighter enforcement rules to root out fraud. Stricter enforcement of the program will likely target medical care providers who seek to collect money, but these changes may also affect individual residents who are working through the New York Medicaid application process.

An editorial in last Friday’s Albany Times Union called upon the legislature not to go “soft” on Medicaid users. Recent problems of fraud in institutions serving those with developmental disabilities were used to highlight the current problem with the program. Some observers believe that homes for those who are unable to live independently because of age or disability are the site of the clearest patterns of excessive Medicaid utilization. Several years ago the New York Commission on Quality of Care and Advocacy for the Mentally Disabled noted that Medicaid billing for these services were “costly, fragmented, sometimes unnecessary, and often appeared to be revenue-driven, rather than based on medical necessity.”

Senior care advocates believe that many disabled seniors find themselves in need of dental care, hearing aids, and similar basic services only to be shuffled to alternative medical appointments not of their choosing or tailored to their need. These advocates claim that Medicaid changes are necessary to correct the disconnect between needed services and the ones actually provided. On top of the programmatic problems, the state’s Long Term Care Coalition noted that the Health Department lacks the resources to oversee these adult homes properly. The state body struggles to ensure that nursing homes and senior living facilities are abiding by state rules and regulations. The quality of elder care suffers as a result.

A New York special needs trust is usually the premier method for local residents to provide a disabled child with financial assistance without disqualifying them from receiving government benefits like SSI and Medicaid. Our New York estate planning lawyers know that providing adequate resources for children with special needs is particularly important today because of the increasing life expectancy of disabled youth. The resources needed by these individuals are often substantial, necessitating very careful planning. All families in this situation must ensure that they seek out professional assistance to learn what legal arrangements are best for their unique situation. No two families are identical, and so specialized help is essential.

Failure to seek out experienced legal aid when dealing with these trusts often results in government benefit penalties, negative tax consequences, and damaging family turmoil. Earlier this month Special Needs Answers reported on developments in a complex legal case related to family disagreement over a special needs trust. The case stems from a trust that was set up in 2002 for an 18 year old high school student who suffered severe brain damage after suffering a heart attack. A lawsuit was filed and settled on his behalf against school officials who failed to take action which would have limited the brain damage. The settlement funds were placed in a special needs trust.

The young man died five years later without a will. Per the rules of intestate succession in the state, the trust funds–valued at $8 million at the time of the young man’s death–were supposed to be split between his parents. The child had been estranged from his father for most of his life, but the victim’s mother did not discuss her specific family situation when the trust was created. In order to avoid having her ex-husband share in the fund assets, the mother had a disclaimer drafted and convinced her ex-husband to sign it by claiming it was a document related to burial. The former spouse initiated a legal challenge when he eventually learned that he had signed away his share of $8 million. The ensuing legal battle lasted several years. It was only this year that a local court ruled that the mother acted wrongly in trying to deceive her ex-husband into signing the disclaimer. The estranged father will be allowed to collect half of the funds left in the trust.

For decades our New York estate planning lawyers have helped local residents use living trusts instead of wills to plan their affairs. For many clients a will simply creates more problems than it solves. For example, yesterday the Wall Street Journal published a story exploring the myriad of issues faced by a will executor–the person named to manage the estate of a deceased individual in a will. It was explained how a wide variety of complex tasks are required of the executor, there are legal repercussions when mistakes are made, and many relationships are ruined in the process of settling the estate.

Executors are often siblings or other family members of the deceased. It is the executor’s job to administer a will through the probate process by accounting for assets, paying debts, and distributing property. Red tape, complexity, tedium, and relationship conflicts are inherent in the process. Many professionals in the field report that there has been a steady increase in the number of “executorships gone bad.” Some believe that recent economic troubles have led to more inheritance fights as of late, complicating the executor’s job even further. When a will is challenged by an heir (a frequent occurrence), the executor is usually thrown into the middle of depositions, court appearances, and other legal situations that most would prefer to avoid.

Observers admit that the role of executor is generally not suited for amateurs. Often the individual is required to be aware of taxation rules, potential conflicts of interest, and even investment strategies like picking stocks and bonds. All of this comes with little pay, because state guidelines set the amount of money that an executor can receive.

A Medicaid Asset Protection Trust (MAPT) is one of the best tools available for seniors who do not have long-term care insurance to protect their assets from the staggering cost of nursing home care. This weekend our New York elder law attorney, Bonnie Kraham Esq., had a story published in the Times Herald-Record where she explained the value of this trust for local residents. The article highlighted the specific ways that a MAPT can help local seniors save assets for their family and dispelled misconceptions that some have about creating the trust.

A MAPT is a legal entity that a resident creates with the help of a professional to protect assets from being consumed in order to pay for long-term caregiving costs in the future–usually nursing home care. To create the trust, a resident transfers assets (such as the family home) into the separate legal entity and names someone other than themselves or their spouse as trustee to manage the assets in the trust. The senior may then be able to keep those assets down the road while still qualifying for Medicaid assistance if needed to pay for nursing home care.

Contrary to some misperceptions, local seniors who create a New York Medicaid Asset Protection Trust do not forever “lock up” all of their assets or lose the power to alter what happens to their property. The lifestyle of the senior who creates the trust is usually unaffected, because they still receive pension checks and Social Security checks directly, and they retain the exclusive right to use their home just as before while keeping their home tax exemptions. These trusts are irrevocable, but New York law actually allows the trust to be revoked with written consent of all involved parties. In addition, the individual who creates the trust can amend it to change the beneficiaries at any time.

While it slipped under the radar this year for many families, the first Sunday after Labor Day is Grandparents Day. As explained this week in the Daily Local, the holiday has been the topic of a presidential proclamation every year since 1978. More recently it has been used as a time to raise awareness of the continuing needs of many grandparents in nursing homes and the importance of helping our elders conduct long-term care planning. Considering that the majority of area seniors remain concerned about their future quality of life, our New York elder care attorneys know that all occasions are good ones to discuss these long-term care issues.

The non-profit association which champions Grandparents Day each year explained how the group has been working to help families take steps that will keep their elders in their own homes, instead of nursing homes. Efforts to transition away from nursing home care are growing in popularity nationwide. Our New York elder law estate planning lawyers have long recognized that most area seniors would prefer to “age in place,” receiving the additional care that they need without being forced to move into a nursing home or other long-term care facility.

However, the financial realities of these situations often mean that it is only those who have taken steps to prepare for this time in their lives that ultimately have the freedom to stay at home. For example, residents who visit a professional early enough to discuss these matters often decide to invest in long-term care insurance (LTCI). This insurance can ensure that the resources will be available when necessary to pay for at-home care when a senior is in need of extra assistance with day-to-day tasks. It is difficult to put a price tag on the peace of mind that comes with knowing one has done everything in their power to ensure that their quality of life will remain as high as possible no matter what the future holds.

Professional inheritance planning continues to rise in popularity among all classes of society as more and more seniors reach retirement age and come to appreciate the legal tools available to help in their planning efforts. Interestingly, a new poll discussed in Time magazine this month explains that many of the newest retirees from the Baby Boomer generation have doubts about their heirs’ ability to manage an inheritance. This is a common concern, and our New York estate planning lawyers work with many clients in this area who are specifically tailoring their plans to account for it.

The new survey found that only 49% of millionaire Baby Boomers indicated that leaving money to their children was a priority in their estate planning. When analyzed closely it is clear that the polling figures do not indicate that these parents have stopped worrying about the well-being of their children. Instead, many of them have deep concerns about the effect that a large inheritance will have on their offspring. For example, one-fifth of survey respondents felt that their children would simply squander the inheritance and a quarter of these seniors thought that receiving too much money would only make their heirs lazy. Perhaps because of this, a majority of these retirees admit that they keep their children in the dark about their exact net worth so as to prevent expectations about what will be left behind.

Fear about the financial sense of children has long been a concern for local community members. For decades, attorneys at our New York elder law estate planning firm have worked with residents who were worried about a family member’s ability to handle money. Fortunately, tailoring inheritance plans to account for spendthrift children is exactly a benefit one derives from seeking professional help in this area. A variety of trusts exist which allow parents to pass on the assets they feel appropriate to their heirs in a way that guards against their fears that the inheritance would be wasted, abused, or usurped by a non-relative.

Last week the Wall Street Journal‘s “Family Values” blog discussed the often challenging estate planning issues faced by families who are providing for a disabled loved one. Our New York estate planning lawyers know that more families are in this situation than some might suspect. The latest U.S. Census data shows that roughly 12% of the population has a severe physical or mental disability. When planning for the future it is particularly important for these families to closely consider how they want to leave assets to their heirs because of the effect that the asset transfers may have on their disabled relative’s access to public assistance.

Budget shortfalls are causing many state and local governments to cut support services to these residents. A common cost-cutting measure includes tightening income restrictions for those seeking to qualify for medical benefits and support services. As a result, it is vital that all families structure inheritances for disabled heirs so that they are not disqualified from the government help that they will likely need. Yet, research shows that two-thirds of parents and caregivers with disabled loved ones do not have plans in place to account for the long-term needs of these vulnerable heirs.

This is particularly unfortunate, because there are planning strategies that exist specifically to assist families in this situation. For example, a special needs trust can be used to leave assets to heirs with disabilities while ensuring that they keep government benefits like Medicaid and Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Before this trust was available parents were often forced to disinherit their disabled children lest they lose all their government support. Now, those who create a special needs trust can leave assets for the child’s use beyond that which they will receive from the government. Families can set aside funds for clothing, education, entertainment, household goods, healthcare costs, and many other future wants and needs for their disabled relative.

There is often a default assumption that local parents wish to provide all of their children with equal shares of an inheritance as part of their New York estate plan. However, no two families are identical, and there are a variety of reasons why some parents feel it necessary to provide different assets to each of their children upon their death. The ability to tailor an inheritance using rules different than the default to suit a family’s specific desires is one of the main reasons why local families seek the assistance of New York estate planning lawyers. As one lawyer put it, “there’s nothing so unequal as the equal treatment of unequals.”

Most families take a variety of factors into account when deciding how to distribute their property. For example, one child may already be more financially successful, another may have a larger family of their own, and yet another may be estranged from the family. In other cases a parent may have already helped one child while alive–such as by providing down payment money on a house–and want that prior help to be reflected in the inheritance.

A Wall Street Journal story this weekend discussed how many families have questions about the best way to go about giving one child a larger share than another. Trusts are usually a more effective estate planning tool than a will. However, if a will is used, it is important that certain steps be taken to ensure that the uneven child distribution is capable of withstanding legal challenge. Part of that process involves being open and honest with family members about the inheritance so that children know about the terms while you are alive. This minimizes the surprise factor and may quell later suspicions. Having these conversations is often difficult, so as an alternative a video or instruction letter can be included with the estate planning documents to explain why a certain decision was made.

Contact Information